- From: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 19:09:40 +0000
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk] > As said, I think the definition is strangely restrictive. What if an author used an > image of text, rather than real HTML text, because the author's an amateur who > has no idea how to build a proper page. Is that image of text then exempt from > being tested for contrast issues? [Jason] I agree it's unjustifiably restrictive as written, which is why I wrote a comment in support of the proposal on GitHub to fix the definition. So, I think we're in agreement at this point. ________________________________ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. Thank you for your compliance. ________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2017 19:10:16 UTC