RE: Progressing SC work

+1 to the second option but my two SC 50 &51 have not moved far, other than a discussion with Lisa.  

I am sorry but I am getting rather overwhelmed with all the emails as well as the daily workload, but will keep checking Github. 

Best wishes
E.A.

Mrs E.A. Draffan
WAIS, ECS , University of Southampton
Mobile +44 (0)7976 289103
http://access.ecs.soton.ac.uk
UK AAATE rep http://www.aaate.net/



________________________________________
From: Laura Carlson [laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 February 2017 21:50
To: Glenda Sims; josh@interaccess.ie
Cc: WCAG
Subject: Re: Progressing SC work

Hi Josh and all,

Thank you for asking.

+1 asynchronous discussion and surveys for my SCs as it "seems" they
are "currently" on track to reach consensus.

Additional small group calls may help if/when a proposed SC gets stuck
or we are finding difficulty in reaching consensus.

Kindest regards,
Laura

On 2/2/17, Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com> wrote:
> Josh,
>
> I lean towards option 2 as my default...and then requesting option 1 only
> as needed.  I've been using the LVTF to work through issues before bringing
> things to the full WG.
>
> Glenda
>
> glenda sims    |   team a11y lead   |    deque.com    |    512.963.3773
>
>
> *web for everyone. web on everything.* -  w3 goals
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We have a couple of options for progressing our work:
>>
>> 1) Would you like another team call to discuss issues?
>> This could be done in small teams who wish to work on given SCs.
>>
>> 2) SC Managers: Would you rather just work asynchronously with more
>> surveys etc as required?
>>
>> Any other options that you would like please let us know.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> --
>> Joshue O Connor
>> Director | InterAccess.ie
>>
>


--
Laura L. Carlson

Received on Thursday, 2 February 2017 22:33:32 UTC