Great recap Laura - thank you! I think that one area this WG will need to be in accord over is this: "...then the author has no responsible to create one.", as others on this list are now suggesting that the intent of "Mechanism exists" was to signal that if it wasn't native (to the OS/browser/Assistive Technology, or combination thereof), it was the responsibility of the content author to provide one. I recognize that currently your proposals do not have this language present, however as we go deeper into the need for personalization (etc.), if we keep expecting the author to provide not only the ability, but a widget to do so, we're going to experience significant push-back down the road. I like your final "Option 13" and could support that language (although, be careful of copy-and-paste errors: it should read "...then the author has no *responsibility* to create one.) JF On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com > wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > WOW. We have had a lot of great brainstorming and suggestions for SC > text to combine issues 79, 78, and 74. Many thanks to everyone! > > I have created a Wiki page with the 12 proposals that we have to date. It > is at: > https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/SC_Text_to_Combine_79,_78,_74 > > Did I miss anything? > > Are there any listed that you can't live with? Do you have a preference > for one? > > I will bring these to the LVTF meeting on Thursday for discussion. > > Kindest Regards, > Laura > > -- > Laura L. Carlson > > -- John Foliot Principal Accessibility Strategist Deque Systems Inc. john.foliot@deque.com Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion
Received on Monday, 23 January 2017 19:17:38 UTC