- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 13:10:56 +0000
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On 20/01/2017 12:18, Alastair Campbell wrote: > Well, we’re covering web-content rather than native apps Interesting side note: during discussions in MATF, there has always been some circling around "we want to also target native (mobile) apps", with the point that native apps are still "content". While I share your view that this is about the content only, already with things like Flash we had a certain blurring of the lines (as yes, Flash is content, but essentially its own isolated user agent in many ways). > Just because something isn’t supported on mobile doesn’t mean we > shouldn’t improve things on desktop, assuming that it doesn’t make > the mobile experience worse for everyone else. I think that applies > to Resize content and several other SCs as well. Sure, I just want to make sure the language is crystal clear - because if the SC mandates that something be possible, and the platform doesn't natively provide it (no browser, no OS feature, etc) then it needs to be clear that the onus then doesn't fall on the author to provide customisation dialogs and widgets (unless they want to). P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Friday, 20 January 2017 13:11:22 UTC