Re: CFC Add Zoom Content (formerly Resize content) to Editors Draft

+1

On 6/20/17, Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie> wrote:
> Call For Consensus — ends FridayJune 23rd at 1:00pmBoston time.
>
> The Working Group has reviewed and approved a Success Criterion for
> inclusion in the Editor’s Draft: "Zoom Content (was Resize Content)"
> with the goal of obtaining additional input external to the working group.
>
> SC TEXT:
>
> "Content can be displayed at a minimum width of 320 CSS pixels without
> loss of content or functionality, and without requiring scrolling in the
> direction of text except for parts of the content which require
> two-dimensional layout for usage or meaning.
>
> Note: The width of 320 CSS pixels is equivalent to a browser width of
> 1280 pixels wide at 400% zoom.
>
> Note: Examples of content which require two-dimensional layout are
> images, maps, diagrams, video, games, presentations, data tables, and
> interfaces where it is necessary to keep toolbars in view while
> manipulating content."
>
> Survey results:
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/NewSC_April25_2017/results#xq10
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/SCs_April_11/results#xq6
> GIT Hub: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/77
>
> The new SC can be reviewed here, in the context of the full draft:
> https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/resize-content_ISSUE-77/guidelines/#zoom-content
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have
> not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you
> “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know
> before the CfC deadline.
>
> Thanks
> --
> Joshue O Connor
> Director | InterAccess.ie
>


-- 
Laura L. Carlson

Received on Wednesday, 21 June 2017 11:40:07 UTC