Re: CFC Add Zoom Content (formerly Resize content) to Editors Draft

+1

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 6:11 PM, James Nurthen <james.nurthen@oracle.com>
wrote:

> +1 – although the Note will need to be expanded to provide more examples
> of things where 2-d layout is required. I’d suggest this probably belongs
> in the understanding document rather than a note in the SC.
>
> Another exception which has just come to mind is code editors where the UI
> cannot simply wrap text for various reasons (languages which use carriage
> return as the statement terminator so wrapping would cause problems
> understanding the content, and comment syntax where ther remainder of the
> line is a comment)
>
>
>
> *From:* Jim Allan [mailto:jimallan@tsbvi.edu]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:36 PM
> *To:* Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>
> *Cc:* WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Re: CFC Add Zoom Content (formerly Resize content) to Editors
> Draft
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I placed older SC text into the CFC - The current SC text for this one is:
> [1]
>
> Content can be zoomed to an equivalent width of 320 CSS pixels without
> loss of content or functionality, and without requiring scrolling on more
> than one axis except for parts of the content which require two-dimensional
> layout for usage or meaning.
>
> NOTE
>
> 320 CSS pixels is equivalent to a starting viewport width of 1280 CSS
> pixels wide at 400% zoom. For web pages which are designed to scroll
> horizontally, the 320px should be taken as the height rather than width.
>
> NOTE
>
> Examples of content which require two-dimensional layout are images, maps,
> diagrams, video, games, presentations, data tables, and interfaces where it
> is necessary to keep toolbars in view while manipulating content.
>
>
> [1] https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/resize-content_ISSUE-77/
> guidelines/#zoom-content
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__rawgit.com_w3c_wcag21_resize-2Dcontent-5FISSUE-2D77_guidelines_-23zoom-2Dcontent&d=DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&r=ELX2morANsauwtoroVrFb2wD7s1u7PsR47DTXqRvJ34&m=olXQfy88oiqEgv86ZSAlQs4oD03aVIJIc1bn0QQ52l0&s=An2vBJ7L7KIFfjnShJ69YLrlv7PNWnW4o68reW9ENn8&e=>
>
> Thanks
>
> Josh
>
>
>
> Joshue O Connor wrote:
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Friday June 23rd at 1:00pm Boston time.
>
>
>
> The Working Group has reviewed and approved a Success Criterion for
> inclusion in the Editor’s Draft: "Zoom Content (was Resize Content)" with
> the goal of obtaining additional input external to the working group.
>
> SC TEXT:
>
> "Content can be displayed at a minimum width of 320 CSS pixels without
> loss of content or functionality, and without requiring scrolling in the
> direction of text except for parts of the content which require
> two-dimensional layout for usage or meaning.
>
> Note: The width of 320 CSS pixels is equivalent to a browser width of 1280
> pixels wide at 400% zoom.
>
> Note: Examples of content which require two-dimensional layout are images,
> maps, diagrams, video, games, presentations, data tables, and interfaces
> where it is necessary to keep toolbars in view while manipulating content."
>
> Survey results:
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/NewSC_April25_2017/results#xq10
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.w3.org_2002_09_wbs_35422_NewSC-5FApril25-5F2017_results-23xq10&d=DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&r=ELX2morANsauwtoroVrFb2wD7s1u7PsR47DTXqRvJ34&m=olXQfy88oiqEgv86ZSAlQs4oD03aVIJIc1bn0QQ52l0&s=alLmDrufz3J8Zm4hcd9HEp2D1mtY_Op7ruUApk21C7c&e=>
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/SCs_April_11/results#xq6
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.w3.org_2002_09_wbs_35422_SCs-5FApril-5F11_results-23xq6&d=DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&r=ELX2morANsauwtoroVrFb2wD7s1u7PsR47DTXqRvJ34&m=olXQfy88oiqEgv86ZSAlQs4oD03aVIJIc1bn0QQ52l0&s=WDDXQWHs5IhKmZ2vzzZ6bYIEtwxqhLdiIpBVB9D49ys&e=>
> GIT Hub: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/77
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_w3c_wcag21_issues_77&d=DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&r=ELX2morANsauwtoroVrFb2wD7s1u7PsR47DTXqRvJ34&m=olXQfy88oiqEgv86ZSAlQs4oD03aVIJIc1bn0QQ52l0&s=jZ-Qp0QISK2g46yM5VIBTrMzNANYmV3HgbWgZMb3aa4&e=>
>
> The new SC can be reviewed here, in the context of the full draft:
>
> https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/resize-content_ISSUE-77/
> guidelines/#zoom-content
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__rawgit.com_w3c_wcag21_resize-2Dcontent-5FISSUE-2D77_guidelines_-23zoom-2Dcontent&d=DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&r=ELX2morANsauwtoroVrFb2wD7s1u7PsR47DTXqRvJ34&m=olXQfy88oiqEgv86ZSAlQs4oD03aVIJIc1bn0QQ52l0&s=An2vBJ7L7KIFfjnShJ69YLrlv7PNWnW4o68reW9ENn8&e=>
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Joshue O Connor
> Director *| InterAccess.ie *
>
>
>
> --
> Joshue O Connor
> Director *| InterAccess.ie *
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator
>
> Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
> 1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
> voice 512.206.9315 <(512)%20206-9315>    fax: 512.206.9264
> <(512)%20206-9264>  http://www.tsbvi.edu/
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.tsbvi.edu_&d=DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&r=ELX2morANsauwtoroVrFb2wD7s1u7PsR47DTXqRvJ34&m=olXQfy88oiqEgv86ZSAlQs4oD03aVIJIc1bn0QQ52l0&s=2Yui4vA_sM5jBw3SSXv36EmAFZTADm0Gg097ONJbPDI&e=>
>
> "We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964
>