W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2017

Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1

From: Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 17:00:04 -0500
Message-ID: <CAH2ngETYPHNXr9Y6A9YQh3RHk5z-u7A61OzdCABd8pCBWKsAgA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
+1

glenda sims    |   team a11y lead   |    deque.com    |    512.963.3773


*web for everyone. web on everything.* -  w3 goals

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
wrote:

> Resending with the “high priority” flag per our process…
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Thursday May 25rd at 12:00pm Boston time.
>
> The Working Group has discussed the idea of providing additional guidance
> for accessibility beyond what is able to be included within WCAG 2.1. The
> idea is that success criteria proposals that cannot reach consensus or that
> there is insufficient time to review still have valuable information that
> might be able to be published for use. This idea was surveyed (
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/WCAG21_supp/results
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2002%2F09%2Fwbs%2F35422%2FWCAG21_supp%2Fresults&data=02%7C01%7C%7C0e1bcac07c814137cfe008d4a1f37ca4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636311514529786507&sdata=Z09nKmrz3%2BdDRAlSQIgS6EnTF3tnyKnkhx6IU63M3ds%3D&reserved=0>)
> and discussed on the call (https://www.w3.org/2017/05/
> 23-ag-minutes.html#item01
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2017%2F05%2F23-ag-minutes.html%23item01&data=02%7C01%7C%7C0e1bcac07c814137cfe008d4a1f37ca4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636311514529786507&sdata=fuNXCihUvTIK85l38EKARZUd1nbx6vv6mPMVhkv2TNg%3D&reserved=0>)
> and a resolution received consensus:
>
> RESOLUTION: the working group has agreed to publisihing supplemental
> guidance in 1 document that is non-normative
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
> Thanks,
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
> Adobe
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C0e1bcac07c814137cfe008d4a1f37ca4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636311514529786507&sdata=O8WWKVhUNZMueiHT4tYMcpGAwn8CCG0MbtYsKZc6jO4%3D&reserved=0>
> Thanks,
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
> Adobe
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C0e1bcac07c814137cfe008d4a1f37ca4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636311514529786507&sdata=O8WWKVhUNZMueiHT4tYMcpGAwn8CCG0MbtYsKZc6jO4%3D&reserved=0>
>
Received on Tuesday, 23 May 2017 22:00:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 08:04:10 UTC