W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2017

Re: Can you confirm if you want the sensitive data exception for timeouts

From: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 09:57:38 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEy-OxER1bq4_yShjnDW+vKrjsCM_RF9-0zCJekdACOS+haTgg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Cc: Greg Lowney <gcl-0039@access-research.org>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I agree with Hreg and David!

Katie Haritos-Shea
703-371-5545

On May 5, 2017 8:12 AM, "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> ---- On Fri, 05 May 2017 08:26:41 +0300 *Greg
> Lowney<gcl-0039@access-research.org <gcl-0039@access-research.org>>*
> wrote ----
>
> I brought up the case because I felt we should make an explicit decision
> about it, but my preference is to not include an exception in the SC, and
> instead to add wording to the Understanding document explaining the
> rationale as you stated it: if any data cannot be saved, whether to
> security or other reasons, they need to either warn about the timeout ahead
> of time or make the timeout period extremely long.
>
> Speaking of which, the Understanding document should also explain why we
> don't offer the alternative approach of prompting the user at the end of
> the timeout period with an option to extend.
>
>     Greg
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Can you confirm if you want the sensitive data exception for
> timeouts
> From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
> To: W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> Date: 5/4/2017 7:57 PM
>
> Hi Folks
>
> on yesterdays call people asked to we'll add the sensitive data exception
> so that we do not  force people to keep sensitive data
>
> However we don't force them to keep the data, it's just that if they don't
> they need to provide a warning about any timeout period.
>
> People need to know how long they have to fill out the form. I do not
> think that goes away just becuse the data is sensitive.
>
>
> Unfortunately the Que was closed and I could not comment, so I am not sure
> how to proceed here
>
> Do we want  the sensitive data exception?
>
> Also can anyone suggest wording for sensitive data that will not create a
> huge loophole for everything?
>
> what I have so far is :
> sensitive information - information that can put users at risk
>
>
> issue on github is : https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/14
>
> All the best
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 5 May 2017 13:58:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 5 May 2017 13:58:15 UTC