W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2017

Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC - deadline - 6th May 18:00 EST.

From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 15:55:11 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAdDpDYkO72PvEVeJjjNkws5rx-cuRorN_sjAaQDY+Ui5ay19Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>
Cc: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I suggest we drop back to 300%.

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie> wrote:

> Thanks Alastair for following up.
>
> Josh
>
> Alastair Campbell wrote:
>
> Um, I sent this to the list a week ago, could we start there?
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> I’ve put together some initial responses to comments on the Resize content
> SC, both from public/member comments, and the recent survey:
>
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Resize_
> content_issues_review
>
>
>
> I’ve combined up comments and grouped them by theme to keep it (more)
> manageable, so there are three main responses, and then ‘other issues’
> below is smaller issues/comments.
>
>
>
> I **think** most aspects can be tackled in the understanding document,
> and the proposed the response outlines what that would be.
>
>
>
> The main question is the relation to the current 1.4.4, where (as
> predicted) it would be clearer if we could edit 1.4.4, even just to raise
> it a level.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Joshue O Connor
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Apologies but we had a resolution on this SC on a call in January but I
> neglected to send out the CFC to the list. Thanks to Marc Johlic for
> pointing this out - so I'm sending this out now. [1]
>
> On that call  - the working group accepted the proposed SC 'Resize
> Content' - with minor changes. [1]
>
> Here is a link to the issue and the most recent survey. [2] [3]
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline  - 6th May 18:00 EST.
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2017/01/31-wai-wcag-minutes.html#resolution03
> [2] https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/77
> [3] https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/SC_review_Jan2017/results
>
> --
> Joshue O Connor
> Director *| InterAccess.ie *
>
>
> --
> Joshue O Connor
> Director | InterAccess.ie
>
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:55:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:55:47 UTC