W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2017

Re: SC Managers and public comments

From: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 10:39:05 +0100
Message-ID: <58F73039.10804@interaccess.ie>
To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
CC: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org

> Patrick H. Lauke <mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk>
> 19 April 2017 at 10:11
> On 19/04/2017 10:07, Joshue O Connor wrote:
>> All replies to any comment need to be agreed as the working group
>> consensus for that issue. They need to be drafted and then  surveyed by
>> the group.
>>
>> Those replies can be surveyed by the group etc.
>
> Would I be right in saying that this applies only to *official* 
> replies denoted as coming explicitly from the WCAG WG? 
Correct. Discussion can continue for sure - but at some stage there has 
to be a 'consensus' reply from the group. We can mark them as such in 
the comment itself.
So for example, if Detlev makes a response that the group feel 
represents the consensus stance - (after survey etc) - then it can be 
marked up/labelled as such.

> Because otherwise, I'd question why we're using a social-like platform 
> like GitHub, which allows individuals to comment on things, at all.
There are pros and cons to using the platform - most options are messy 
one way or another IMO.

Thanks

Josh
>
> P
>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Josh
>>
>> InterAccess - Accessible UX
>>
>> -------- Original message --------
>> From: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>
>> Date: 19/04/2017 09:45 (GMT+00:00)
>> To: josh@interaccess.ie, laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com
>> Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: SC Managers and public comments
>>
>> I have already replied to public comments to issue #61 Pointer 
>> gestures by
>>
>> - Webaim https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/264
>> - Microsoft https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/196
>>
>> ...as well as to a public comment on issue #66 Pointer inputs with
>> additional sensors by
>>
>> - Miocrosoft https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/194
>>
>> not knowing that this was not the expected procedure.
>>
>> Should I delete or move my replies so they may forst be discussed /
>> agreed upon?
>>
>> Best,
>> Detlev
>>
>> -- 
>> Detlev Fischer
>> testkreis c/o feld.wald.wiese
>> Thedestr. 2, 22767 Hamburg
>>
>> Mobil +49 (0)157 57 57 57 45
>> Fax +49 (0)40 439 10 68-5
>>
>> http://www.testkreis.de
>> Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites
>
>
> Joshue O Connor <mailto:josh@interaccess.ie>
> 19 April 2017 at 10:07
> All replies to any comment need to be agreed as the working group 
> consensus for that issue. They need to be drafted and then  surveyed 
> by the group.
>
> Those replies can be surveyed by the group etc.
>
> Thanks
>
> Josh
>
> InterAccess - Accessible UX
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>
> Date: 19/04/2017 09:45 (GMT+00:00)
> To: josh@interaccess.ie, laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com
> Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> Subject: Re: SC Managers and public comments
>
> I have already replied to public comments to issue #61 Pointer 
> gestures by
>
> - Webaim https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/264
> - Microsoft https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/196
>
> ...as well as to a public comment on issue #66 Pointer inputs with 
> additional sensors by
>
> - Miocrosoft https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/194
>
> not knowing that this was not the expected procedure.
>
> Should I delete or move my replies so they may forst be discussed / 
> agreed upon?
>
> Best,
> Detlev
>
> --
> Detlev Fischer
> testkreis c/o feld.wald.wiese
> Thedestr. 2, 22767 Hamburg
>
> Mobil +49 (0)157 57 57 57 45
> Fax +49 (0)40 439 10 68-5
>
> http://www.testkreis.de
> Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites

-- 
Joshue O Connor
Director | InterAccess.ie
Received on Wednesday, 19 April 2017 09:39:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 19 April 2017 09:39:46 UTC