- From: Gregg Vanderheiden RTF <gregg@raisingthefloor.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 23:26:56 -0400
- To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Greg Lowney <gcl-0039@access-research.org>, "w3c-waI-gl@w3. org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
J & K does not fit SC format. Not a TF statement H&I does not work — because if you parse it is says. “if tech can do it, the following is true” which is always true. Because if the last half of the sentence is not possible then it is exempt by the phrasing. I know taht isnt the intent — but that is how the sentence parses. maybe define IT? g > On Apr 13, 2017, at 1:05 PM, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Greg and all, > > Greg, thank you for your input on the call today [1]. I have added > your proposals to the Wiki page as Proposal J (Level A) that removes > hard metrics from the SC and Proposal K (Level AAA). [2] Please adjust > these as you see fit. > > As Andrew requested, tomorrow I'll ask on-list for a vote between J&K > and H&I [3]. They both use an in tandem 2 SC approach. > > Kindest Regards, > Laura > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2017/04/13-ag-minutes.html#item01 > > [2] J&K Proposal > https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Issue_78_Options#Greg_L.27s_Proposal_J_.28Level_A.29_and_K_.28Level_AAA.29:_Also_an_in_tandem_2_SC_approach > > [3] H&I Proposal > https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Issue_78_Options#Proposal_H_.28Level_AA.29_and_I_.28Level_AAA.29:_An_in_tandem_2_SC_approach > > -- > Laura L. Carlson >
Received on Friday, 14 April 2017 03:27:31 UTC