W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2017

Re: SC Managers and public comments

From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 14:58:45 +0000
To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
CC: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1D3D33EF-FDB6-4C28-BD45-FF748E597ABA@adobe.com>
Yes, we shouldn’t respond to the comments until we know the answer for sure.

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe 

akirkpat@adobe.com
http://twitter.com/awkawk








On 4/10/17, 09:54, "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi Andrew,
>
>Does this mean that SC managers shouldn't officially reply to the
>public comments (saying yes your idea was incorporated or no your idea
>has not been incorporated or some of your idea has been incorporated,
>etc) until the CFC and the SC text has been accepted by the working
>group? This would seem to alleviate much circular discussion.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Kindest Regards,
>Laura
>
>
>On 4/10/17, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote:
>> Yes, I agree.
>>
>> To sum up, we want to have a current version of the SC available from the
>> links at the top of the issue, so the SC manager needs to update the text in
>> the “SC for editing” linked page.
>>
>> Of course, this should be done with the good ideas from others commenting on
>> the issue.
>>
>> What this does, to provide some high-level context for people, is it updates
>> a branch in the repository that is separate from the editor’s draft. This
>> serves as a review copy for the group and has no special standing related to
>> ultimate acceptance from the group, except that it shows what is believed to
>> be getting closer to a final form.
>>
>> Once the larger group reviews it and any final edits are put in place (and
>> we have a CFC to accept it) then we will merge that branch into the editor’s
>> draft, and the SC will appear in the monthly Working Drafts.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> AWK
>>
>> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
>> Adobe
>>
>> akirkpat@adobe.com
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C283361933e6e455bc8ac08d480191ced%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636274292728855015&sdata=c8q7ShJd8BVBtl4zwCmCtSeN7gn0PTYAgSMV2TIo5T4%3D&reserved=0
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/10/17, 08:43, "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Thanks, Josh!
>>>
>>>Kindest regards,
>>>Laura
>>>
>>>On 4/10/17, Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie> wrote:
>>>> Hi Laura,
>>>>> Are SC Managers supposed to draft a proposed response for the public
>>>>> comment pending official working group approval?
>>>> Yes - that's the idea. Ideally, you can distill what you think an
>>>> appropriate response is, based on group input into the SC etc
>>>> and we will survey that to the group.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Josh
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Or we just supposed to respond as individual SC managers on the public
>>>>> comment?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kindest Regards,
>>>>> Laura
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Joshue O Connor <mailto:josh@interaccess.ie>
>>>>> 5 April 2017 at 08:44
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrew and I have now assigned the current tranche of public comments
>>>>> to the SC Managers.
>>>>>
>>>>> We ask all SC managers to please review the comments for your issues,
>>>>> parse its contents etc - distill the substance and draft a
>>>>> response/any outputs etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> In some cases comments have been applied to people who are not SC
>>>>> managers but they are usually to people who
>>>>> have already made a reply or demonstrated some interest in the
>>>>> issue/comment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Joshue O Connor
>>>> Director | InterAccess.ie
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Laura L. Carlson
>>
>
>
>-- 
>Laura L. Carlson
Received on Monday, 10 April 2017 14:59:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 10 April 2017 14:59:23 UTC