W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2017

Re: SC Managers and public comments

From: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 14:37:38 +0200 (CEST)
To: josh@interaccess.ie
Cc: laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com, akirkpat@adobe.com, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-Id: <20170410123738.5751D6820434@dd24924.kasserver.com>
"Update the original issue" can still mean A or B - which is it?


Joshue O Connor schrieb am 10.04.2017 14:30:

> IIRC we had agreed to update the original issue.
> 
> Andrew - is this correct?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Josh
> 
>> 
>> Detlev Fischer <mailto:detlev.fischer@testkreis.de> 
>> 
>> 10 April 2017 at 13:25
>> 
>> 
>> My question here is whether what re-drafting option you /chairs and members of WCAG would prefer:
>> 
>> A: adding revised draft SC text as new comment to the original issue, waiting for comments by others
>> B: Making the change in the SC source (via the "edit this SC" link, which might invalidate some earlier comments)
>> C: adding revised SC text as comment to the issue raised to which the change is a response
>> D: Create an new issue for the revised text
>> 
>> I currently assume A and/or C is the correct approach.
>> 
>> Detlev
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Detlev Fischer
>> testkreis c/o feld.wald.wiese
>> Thedestr. 2, 22767 Hamburg
>> 
>> Mobil +49 (0)157 57 57 57 45
>> Fax +49 (0)40 439 10 68-5
>> 
>> http://www.testkreis.de <http://www.testkreis.de> 
>> Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites
>> 
>> 
>> Joshue O Connor <mailto:josh@interaccess.ie> 
>> 
>> 10 April 2017 at 12:57
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Laura,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Are SC Managers supposed to draft a proposed response for the public
>>> comment pending official working group approval?
>>> 
>>> 
>> Yes - that's the idea. Ideally, you can distill what you think an appropriate response is, based on group input into the SC etc
>> and we will survey that to the group.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Josh
>> 
>>> 
>>> Or we just supposed to respond as individual SC managers on the public comment?
>>> 
>>> Thank you.
>>> 
>>> Kindest Regards,
>>> Laura
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Joshue O Connor <mailto:josh@interaccess.ie> 
>>> 
>>> 5 April 2017 at 08:44
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> Andrew and I have now assigned the current tranche of public comments to the SC Managers.
>>> 
>>> We ask all SC managers to please review the comments for your issues, parse its contents etc - distill the substance and draft a response/any outputs etc.
>>> 
>>> In some cases comments have been applied to people who are not SC managers but they are usually to people who
>>> have already made a reply or demonstrated some interest in the issue/comment.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> 
>> Laura Carlson <mailto:laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> 
>> 
>> 10 April 2017 at 12:41
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Josh and Andrew,
>> 
>> Are SC Managers supposed to draft a proposed response for the public
>> comment pending official working group approval?
>> 
>> Or we just supposed to respond as individual SC managers on the public comment?
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> 
>> Kindest Regards,
>> Laura
>> 
>> 
>> Joshue O Connor <mailto:josh@interaccess.ie> 
>> 
>> 5 April 2017 at 08:44
>> 
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Andrew and I have now assigned the current tranche of public comments to the SC Managers.
>> 
>> We ask all SC managers to please review the comments for your issues, parse its contents etc - distill the substance and draft a response/any outputs etc.
>> 
>> In some cases comments have been applied to people who are not SC managers but they are usually to people who
>> have already made a reply or demonstrated some interest in the issue/comment.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> 
> --
> Joshue O Connor
> Director | InterAccess.ie
> 
>
Received on Monday, 10 April 2017 12:38:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 08:04:09 UTC