Re: SC Managers and success criteria review

Hi Alastair

I wasn't comfortable putting "yes" in the testable column until the group
decides if terms such as "important information" are sufficiently testable.

I've added a check in the all technologies for that. For implementability,
I left it blank until I could understand the implications of requiring
images to meet this for millions of online text books etc... I would need
to be convinced of that... but I'm open to how it would work.

For #77 I've updated the "all technologies" column as per our discussion.
So the the SC passes all the acceptance criteria in my personal assessment.
I think we're going to have to improve the language for the exception
"If the user-agent fits the layout to the viewport and does not provide a
means of reflowing content, two dimensional scrolling is exempt."

I didn't map that to a mobile screen scenario in my brain, so I guess
others not as close will miss that also.


Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:

> Hi David,
>
>
>
> That’s awesome, I hope a few more people get a chance to review some more
> as well.
>
>
>
> I guess that a lack of “yes” in a column doesn’t mean “no”, but that you
> aren’t convinced yet?
>
>
>
> For the ones I’m managing (9 and 77) it would be helpful to know what
> aspects you think are not working.
>
>
>
> E.g. for 9 (graphics contrast), it looks like you aren’t convinced about
> the testability, condition vs method, and all-technologies. However, there
> are no comments on github about those aspects.
>
>
>
> I think it does pass those SC criteria, but if you (or others) can’t tell
> that then it is a problem, I just can’t tell how to address it yet.
>
>
>
> I realise it’s more work and you’ve already reviewed more than anyone, but
> for progress on each one it would help to have specific comments or
> feedback. Not necessarily from you, from anyone, but you’ve got there first!
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
> PS. For 77, I replied to the comment, I think it does work across
> technologies, it was something we discussed a while ago and thought we came
> to a resolution (which generated the second exception).
>
>
>