Re: Re[2]: SC Managers and success criteria review

That's right Joshue.

 Any member who assumes it is a group consensus may not have been reading
our emails or following the group discussion sufficiently, and since this
is a group list I think it is important for members to follow along.

I also think its important for members to take initiative and not feel
intimidated to jump in and start working... so we can meet the Feb 23 First
Public working draft deadline that the group has forced upon itself.

The consensus on whether an SC passes the acceptance criteria would come
from the surveys where these acceptance criteria would be polled from each
member.

Lisa these are short names for the conformance acceptance criteria ... so
yes, they are the same.

I have said "yes" for one that I am reasonably sure there will be consensus
on. Otherwise I left them blank, waiting for the group's opinion, because I
could not make a determination. It is not an indication of "fail" it is
just that I cannot say that I believe words like "clearly" and "easily" are
testable. The group may come to consensus on this, but they are huge
changes ...


Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 11:59 AM, josh@interaccess.ie <josh@interaccess.ie>
wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for coming up with this way of looking at/presenting the candidate
> SCs, these suggestions are helpful and will be useful for this next
> important phase.
> We are a little concerned that the estimations recorded in this
> spreadsheet, such as in 'Details',  may be perceived as the consensus of
> the group.  We  believe that this is not your intention, and that you wish
> to help the work progress but it could be perceived by others as
> representing group consensus.
>
> So while we are happy for you to share your opinion, we urge working group
> members to not view this spreadsheet as being the 'current state of
> consensus' regarding these issues and to make sure they look at each
> proposal with a critical eye, to help the group arrive at the best success
> criteria it can.
>
> Many thanks (as always) for your enthusiasm and efforts.
>
> Thanks
>
> Josh/AWK
>
>