Hi David,
That's a very good question. There are currently 61 marked as ready for
review. 1 from DPUB, 4 by LVTF, 15 by MWTF, and another 41 by COGA.
It certainly doesn't seem like putting every SC through the survey will get
us there fast enough. We should probably group them and have a few people
do the reviews of each within the next few weeks. That way everything gets
a pass, although be it not extensively. By doing that I bet we can weed out
the ones that will likely cause lots of discussion, and prioritise them
based on that.
Just my 2 cents :)
Wilco
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 12:25 AM, David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com>
wrote:
> Wow, 75 SCs to vet before our First Public Working Draft due In
> February... plus figuring out where they go and how to order things in the
> new WCAG.
>
> Any thoughts on how to do that in 12 meetings?
>
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
> Tel: 613.235.4902 <(613)%20235-4902>
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
>
>
> * Adapting the web to all users*
> * Including those with disabilities*
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
--
*Wilco Fiers*
Senior Accessibility Engineer - Co-facilitator WCAG-ACT - Chair Auto-WCAG
