Re: CfC: Silver process

+1.

Regards,
Srinivasu Chakravarthula | Informatica | @CSrinivasu
Sent from my iPhone

On 26-Oct-2016, at 22:35, "alands289@gmail.com<mailto:alands289@gmail.com>" <alands289@gmail.com<mailto:alands289@gmail.com>> wrote:

+1 on this CFC.

Alan

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

From: Léonie Watson<mailto:tink@tink.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 11:57 AM
To: Andrew Kirkpatrick<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>; WCAG<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Re: CfC: Silver process

+1 to this CFC.

Léonie.

--
@LeonieWatson tink.uk<http://tink.uk> Carpe diem

On 25/10/2016 21:43, Andrew Kirkpatrick wrote:
> CALL FOR CONSENSUS - ends Thursday October 27 at 5:00pm Boston time.
>
> This is a proposed response to an decision of the Working Group.  The
> item was surveyed, discussed on the WG call, and approved
> (http://www.w3.org/2016/10/25-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item07).
>
> The decision is that the process defined
> at https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Process_of_Designing_Silver is agreed
> to by the working group as the way forward with a longer effort to
> research, develop requirements, and begin to produce a major update to
> WCAG. Please review the minutes of the call and the survey responses as
> you consider this CfC.
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus decision that have
> not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you
> "not being able to live with" this position, please let the group know
> before the CfC deadline.
>
> Thanks,
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
> Adobe
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com> <mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>

Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2016 17:14:45 UTC