Re: Re[4]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review

Yes,  I agree it is editorial, given our consensus on the call.

Removing the sentence will address my concerns, and will allow us to make
these decisions in due process rather than rushed without full
consideration of implications...

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
wrote:

> David,
> The chairs and Michael think that this change is editorial because it was
> already in the background and can be made without affecting the CfC.
>
> So, once that is done, you’re ok with this?
>
> Thanks,
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
> Adobe
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>
> From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
> Date: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 15:35
> To: "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie>
> Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Re[4]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
> Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 15:35
>
> For me the amended charter language doesn't accomplish what I presented at
> the phone meeting, because the sentence that I objected to remains in the
> Normative Section (3.1) . Can we simply delete the sentence:
>
> "The Working Group intends to produce regular updates for WCAG guidelines,
> starting with WCAG 2.1. The public schedule for the updates is documented
> in the AG WG Project Management Plan."
>
> We've signaled to the ACs in the background section that we intent to
> update accessibility guidance on an approximate 3 year cadence. I hope
> that's enough ... Removing this sentence from the normative section will
> address all my concerns at this time and will allow us to see how 2.1 goes
> before we say more about how we will make shorter cycles between releases.
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
> Tel:  613.235.4902
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 3:19 PM, josh@interaccess.ie <josh@interaccess.ie>
> wrote:
>
>> >I had the feeling thongs had changed
>>
>> They sure have :-)
>>
>> Josh
>>
>>
>