L?onie, My understanding is that section 3.1 speaks to the normative documents to be created by the group, but is not different from the background section. Michael, can you clarify? Thanks, AWK Sent from my iPad On Oct 13, 2016, at 5:11 AM, L?onie Watson <tink@tink.uk<mailto:tink@tink.uk>> wrote: On 12/10/2016 22:43, Andrew Kirkpatrick wrote: David, The chairs and Michael think that this change is editorial because it was already in the background and can be made without affecting the CfC. Sorry if this puts a spanner (monkey wrench) in the works, but the statement David would like removed is normative - so is this really an editorial change? Removing normative content would seem to negate those responses already received on this CFC (mine for one). L?onie. -- @LeonieWatson tink.uk<http://tink.uk> Carpe diem
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2016 09:51:56 UTC