- From: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>
- Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 15:33:04 +0000
- To: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>, 'Laura Carlson' <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- CC: 'AlastairCampbell' <acampbell@nomensa.com>, 'WCAG' <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, 'public-low-vision-a11y-tf' <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL [mailto:ryladog@gmail.com] > Laura, > > Thanks. I do think WCAG might need to provide clarification on the combining > issue. Do we want the least number of SC or do we want good testable specific > SC? [Jason] To the extent that there's a conflict between those two objectives, it should be recalled that criteria which aren't "specific" and "testable" are unlikely to be accepted into a W3C WCAG Recommendation. That is, I don't think there's a general willingness to accept a reduction in quality by comparison to what went into WCAG 2.0, especially in any document that has policy mplications, as WCAG 2.1 is expected to do. ________________________________ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. Thank you for your compliance. ________________________________
Received on Monday, 3 October 2016 15:33:39 UTC