- From: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:02:25 -0400
- To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Cc: Gregg Vanderheiden <gregg@raisingthefloor.org>, GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Andrew, I have recorded my thoughts. Fine by me if the group has consciously decided to retain the "or shared" wording in there. Best regards, Sailesh On 8/9/16, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote: > Sailesh, > This is in a CfC now, so the key question is whether your concern is about > something that you can live with or if it is not. > > Thanks, > AWK > > Andrew Kirkpatrick > Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility > Adobe > > akirkpat@adobe.com > http://twitter.com/awkawk > > > > > > > > On 8/9/16, 21:23, "Sailesh Panchang" <sailesh.panchang@deque.com> wrote: > >>With reference to: "2. Use glossary definitions to simplify and >> shorten all Success Criteria for shared or ambiguous terms": >> Comment: is the word "shared" needed? >> A term may appear in multiple places but if its meaning is not >> ambiguous then it does not need a definition. >> A term even if used only once may need a definition if: >> - it is used in a manner that is not in line with what is generally >> understood to mean or convey. >> - or to limit its meaning to a specific interpretation among >> multiple possible interpretations >> >>This is what "ambiguous" generally conveys but it might be helpful to >>clarify along the lines suggested. >>Thanks, >>Sailesh Panchang >
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2016 13:02:53 UTC