Re: Acceptance Criteria for proposals for new Success Criteria

>>I don't think "shared" is strictly needed, but neither do I insist on change. This is only >>an internal guide to be used by the working group in developing success criteria, >>after all - not a formal document.

Yes I understand that it is an in internal guide. Then why insist that
it said "reliably testable"  instead of "testable" and such.
The idea is that people who draft SCs  have a clear list of do's and
don'ts as a guide. My comment is in the same vein as yours and I
believe is motivated with the same intention.
Thanks and regards,
Sailesh Panchang

Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2016 16:15:59 UTC