Re: Just to clarify: 2.1 is extension, Silver is Rewrite?

> On Jul 21, 2016, at 11:58 PM, Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> If my assumption is correct then don't we want keep the 2.1 changes to minimal with changes that only reflecting missed use cases from 2.0.
> If new SCs coincide with 2.0 SCs they only strengthen them. 2.1 won't fix all gaps caused by changes in technology.
> Shouldn't Silver make those updates?
> I'm just a little confused about things that seem like structural changes.
> Wayne

can you say this with more words?   not clear what you are saying. 

is there supposed to be a  THEN in line two?  

and what is thought process on conclusions? 

thx