Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace ​"programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"?

that's right... I've only proposed to broaden the definition. It's on this
WIKI.

https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Modify_2.4.4_to_include_Accessible_Name_for_link_destination


Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> *From:* David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 20, 2016 1:30 PM
>
> At a very minimum I think we should drop the note about a sentence being
> link context, and add Accessible Name as an option.
>
>
>
> *[Jason] I think my proposal to broaden the definition of
> “programmatically determined link context” addresses David’s issue. So far,
> no one has put forward good reasons for rejecting it.*
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
> ------------------------------
>

Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2016 18:56:05 UTC