- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 06:47:49 -0500
- To: "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie>
- Cc: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Thanks Josh. That is useful to know. The Low Vision Task Force has used our Accessibility Requirements for People with Low Vision (User Needs Document) doc [1] to create a Gap Analysis (WCAG & UAAG) [2]. We are starting to work through the the Gap Analysis to develop Success Criteria via Github issues [3]. It seems to me quite a few of the LVTF User Needs that start with "Users can" will end up in Silver. Kindest Regards, Laura [1] http://w3c.github.io/low-vision-a11y-tf/requirements.html [2] https://w3c.github.io/low-vision-a11y-tf/WC-UA-alignment.html [3] https://github.com/w3c/low-vision-SC/issues On 7/6/16, josh@interaccess.ie <josh@interaccess.ie> wrote: > Great question Alastair! Yes, we mark them as for 'Silver'. > > It is very useful to know which SCs are more applicable to the UA space. > > Thanks a mil > > Josh > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Alastair Campbell" <acampbell@nomensa.com> > To: "WCAG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > Sent: 06/07/2016 12:03:40 > Subject: User agent SCs? > >>Hi everyone, >> >> >> >>I’ve started looking through some of the task force success criteria >>proposals and I have a high-level question: What do we do with SCs that >>seem best dealt with by user-agents? >> >> >> >>Just as an example, several of the low vision ones [1] definitely seem >>to be user-agent issues, such as the user being able to select >>line/word/letter spacing, justification, margins on text, etc. I assume >>other TFs will also have SCs best dealt with on the user-agent side. >> >> >> >>Are they likely to be moved back to post-WCAG 2.1? >> >> >> >>My intent was to try and see the shape forming from the new >>requirements, what kind of things are coming up and where are they >>fitting in to the 2.0 “POUR” structure. However, that’s tricky when you >>don’t think they should be in WCAG, but we also don’t have a UAAG >>anymore… >> >> >> >>Is it worth tagging these as user-agent focused in the meantime? >> >> >> >>Cheers, >> >> >> >>-Alastair >> >> >> >>1] https://github.com/w3c/low-vision-SC/issues >> >> >> >>-- >> >> >> >>Alastair Campbell >> >> >> >>www.nomensa.com >> >>follow us: @we_are_nomensa or me: @alastc >> -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2016 11:48:21 UTC