Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content

I've amended the proposal with two versions with the exception... the
language from 1.4.5 and Jason's perhaps more appropriate "spacial"
exception...

https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Possible_wording_from_Jason/David_for_LVTF_re:_zoom_without_horizontal_scroll


Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:05 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
wrote:

> Maybe we can borrow language from SC 2.4.5 the essential exception:
>
> ​* ​
> SC X.X.X If text is resized up to 200% (or 300, 400, 800%?) without
> assistive technology, the layout of the Web page ensures that it can be
> viewed in its entirety without requiring the user to scroll the viewport
> horizontally, and without loss of content or functionality, unless a
> particular presentation of text is essential to the information being
> conveyed.
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
> Tel:  613.235.4902
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 2:22 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> I think it's on the right track ... although we may want to bump up the
>> minimum in 2.1 from 200% to 300% or 400%, (or 800%?) that should be the
>> LVTF's call.
>>
>> And will have to consider Gregg's exceptions, and how to address them....
>> perhaps by using. Maybe limiting the requirement to blocks of text (not in
>> a data table) or something.
>>
>> This would be a new requirement in 2.1 given that WCAG does not forbid
>> the horizontal scroll at Level A. I think we're drifting into LVTF
>> territory, so perhaps we should punt this proposal to them. I've captured
>> the conversation here for them to consider:
>>
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Possible_wording_from_Jason/David_for_LVTF_re:_zoom_without_horizontal_scroll
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David MacDonald
>>
>>
>>
>> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>> Tel:  613.235.4902
>>
>> LinkedIn
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>>
>> twitter.com/davidmacd
>>
>> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>>
>> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>> *  Adapting the web to all users*
>> *            Including those with disabilities*
>>
>> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
>> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 12:49 PM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca]
>>> *Sent:* Monday, July 4, 2016 12:28 PM
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - We want you to make a responsive design that shifts to single column
>>> when zoomed.
>>>
>>> - If a user *does* zoom on their "desktop", we don't want them to loose
>>> information from the "desktop" view/site. So don't drop content, and if you
>>> do, make sure the user can get it back while staying in one column.
>>>
>>> *[Jason] Leaving out the “desktop” and “mobile” aspect, which may not be
>>> needed here, you appear to be saying that there should be a requirement
>>> such as the following.*
>>>
>>> *If text is resized up to 200% without assistive technology, the layout
>>> of the Web page ensures that it can be viewed in its entirety without
>>> requiring the user to scroll the viewport horizontally, and without loss of
>>> content or functionality.*
>>>
>>> *Note: content or functionality may be shifted to a diferent Web page
>>> upon resizing of text, provided that it remains within a conforming set of
>>> Web pages, and that the user can reach it from the page on which text has
>>> been resized.*
>>>
>>> How close is this to your proposal?
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
>>> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
>>> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
>>> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
>>> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
>>> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>>>
>>> Thank you for your compliance.
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>
>>
>

Received on Monday, 4 July 2016 19:36:45 UTC