- From: <josh@interaccess.ie>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:55:06 +0000
- To: "Jonathan Avila" <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>
- Cc: "Paul J. Adam" <paul.adam@deque.com>, "John Foliot" <john.foliot@deque.com>, "Gregg Vanderheiden RTF" <gregg@raisingthefloor.org>, "tink@tink.uk" <tink@tink.uk>, "Katie Haritos-Shea" <ryladog@gmail.com>, "David MacDonald" <david100@sympatico.ca>, "Jason J White" <jjwhite@ets.org>, "Sailesh Panchang" <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>, "Andrew Kirkpatrick" <akirkpat@adobe.com>, "GLWAI Guidelines WG org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
"Jonathan Avila" said: >> Why do you consider it a loophole? Is it not understood that for >>focus indicators need to satisfy colour contrast/luminosity ratios? >We seem to all agree they should but this does not seem to be directly >covered by the success criteria. > >I believe a similar missing need exists When selection and focus are >indicated by the difference in luminosity of background and not by >shape. [...] > >Future updates or extensions need to clearly address luminosity for >visual indication of keyboard focus and address color differences used >for selection. Ok - thanks Jon, I just wanted to check/follow up after Pauls comment. Josh
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2016 12:54:20 UTC