- From: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 08:34:58 -0500
- To: <josh@interaccess.ie>, "'White, Jason J'" <jjwhite@ets.org>, "'Andrew Kirkpatrick'" <akirkpat@adobe.com>, "'Sailesh Panchang'" <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>, "'WCAG'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I like it! * katie * Katie Haritos-Shea Senior Accessibility SME (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA) Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile | Office: 703-371-5545 -----Original Message----- From: josh@interaccess.ie [mailto:josh@interaccess.ie] Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 8:27 AM To: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>; Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>; Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>; WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: Re[2]: Comment / question re. Requirements for WCAG 2.0 Extensions I'm wondering if this suggested text will clarify for Sailesh and address some of Jasons comments/concerns: "Existing success criteria may be altered by the scope of an extension as long as the resulting change continues to either satisfy, reinforce or strengthen the conformance requirements of any given WCAG 2.0 success criteria." My thinking is that, each extension does have a particular scope, or region/area of applicability in relation to existing WCAG success criteria. So by calling that out within the framework requirements this may help readers understand better how they are applied, operate and relate to each other. Would this help? Thanks Josh
Received on Friday, 5 February 2016 13:35:33 UTC