RE: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop



> -----Original Message-----

> One of the main problems I see with this whole rhetoric is: you're still talking
> about "mobile vs desktop" as if those were two nicely separate, distinct silos.
> They're not. We need to move away from treating something as "mobile
> accessibility" and instead qualify it more specifically as being "touchscreen
> accessibility", "small-screen accessibility", etc. Already there are plenty of device
> in the market today (such as 2-in-1 laptops) which blur the line, but still require
> SCs and Guidelines that apply to new input/display/etc methods available.
[Jason] +1 to the above. I also expect the Web to move progressively away from the concept of a "desktop site" and a "mobile site". WCAG 2.1 needs to be written for the Web we are entering, not the Web we're going to leave behind.


________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________

Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2016 17:40:18 UTC