Re[2]: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1

------ Original Message ------
From: "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>

[...]
>I would be interested in this activity. I have some thoughts on this 
>already (I know, shocking huh?), but I'm also interested to hear 
>other's ideas as well.
>
>[Jason] A solution that might work would be to add a prefix letter 
>(e.g., “x”) to the number of every modified or promoted success 
>criterion. This would clearly distinguish version 2.1 from version 2.0 
>success criteria for authors, evaluation tools and in other contexts.
>

Jason - that is like the '4 Tier Numbering' idea. This is captured on 
the wiki here. [1]

If you have any additions/edits we'd like to hear from you.

Thanks

Josh

[1] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_SC_Numbering

>
>I think it should be decided, case by case, whether to rewrite and 
>expand the scope of an existing guideline or success criterion, or 
>whether to introduce a new one. Readability for users of version 2.1 
>would have priority, in my mind, over backward compatibility. Once 
>people move to the new version, the older version becomes much less 
>relevant to most of their work.
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or 
>confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for 
>whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received 
>this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, 
>distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this 
>information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this 
>e-mail is prohibited.
>
>
>Thank you for your compliance.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------