Re: acceptance criteria for new success criteria

Hi Lisa,

I whole heartedly agree with the sentiment and vision of the last six
points. While, yes they are not acceptance criteria it would be great to
have these stated as part of a vision statement, mission or intention.

Best
Thadde6
On May 26, 2016 8:50 AM, "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
>
> I would like to propose the following as acceptance criteria for new
> success criteria or for changes to existing success criteria:
>
>    1. Ensure that requirements may be applied across technologies such as
>    HTML, CSS, SVG etc
>    2. Ensure that the conformance requirements are clear such that most
>    experts will agree if a success criteria has been met.
>    3. Utilize the WCAG 2.0 A/AA/AAA structure.
>
>
> Further, we aim to should provide the following supporting material by
> the time we go to CR.
>
>    1. Identify who benefits from accessible content (such as people with
>    cognitive limitations such as an low short term memory)
>    2. Outline (but not necessarily complete) one supporting technique for
>    each success criteria
>
>
>
> I do not think this should be  acceptance criteria but,  where possible
> and _without_ compromising accessibility,  we should also:
>
>    1. Write it with ease of use in mind
>    2. Success criteria should be potentially machine testable in the
>    future
>    3. Consider and document ideas for authoring tools to reduce the
>    author burden
>    4. Write to a diverse audience
>    5. Try to make it "forward compatible"
>    6. Try to make it fit under the current principles and, where
>    possible, guidelines.
>
>
>
> Note that most of these terms are further discussed at
> https://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2-req/
> All the best
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>
>