Re: CfC: Publish WCAG 2.0 Edited Version with editorial errata only

+1

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>
wrote:

> +1
>
> On 6 May 2016, at 17:20, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> CALL FOR CONSENSUS – ends Tuesday May 10 at 11:20am Boston time.
>
> The Working Group is chartered to publish an edited version of the WCAG
> 2.0 document that incorporates editorial errata.
>
> The Working Group agreed on the call on Tuesday to approve the publication
> of the edited version:
> http://www.w3.org/2016/05/03-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item01. The group had
> a survey and was able to address all concerns:
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/NewWCAGfinalEdit/results.
>
> This publication is not making substantive changes to WCAG 2.0, only
> correcting editorial issues.  The errata are identified here:
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/errata/.
>
> The diff-marked version of the document is located here: new WCAG edited
> recommendation
> <https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2016/WD-WCAG20-20160419/Overview-diff.html> –
> the easiest way to view the individual edits is to search for “begin
> change”.
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this position, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
> Thanks,
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility and Standards
> Adobe
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>
>
>