Re: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques

> On May 1, 2016, at 6:46 PM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:
> 
> Dates on techniques don’t concern me as much as dates on “failures” would do. The latter can be misinterpreted as implying that a given practice wasn’t a failure before a certain date but became a failure thereafter, whereas we’ve established in this discussion that if a documented practice constitutes a failure to conform to WCAG 2.0, then it always was and always will be a failure to conform to WCAG 2.0.
>  

Agree.

would using “Last Reviewed Date”  get around your concern? 

that would make it clear it was related to reviewing rather than dates that things apply.