- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 06:52:50 -0500
- To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
+1 On 4/5/16, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote: > CALL FOR CONSENSUS – ends Thursday April 7 at 1:30pm Boston time. > > GitHub issue 171 related to the need for web pages to use Landmarks to > conform to SC 1.3.1 has a proposed response as a result of a survey and > discussion on the working group call > (https://www.w3.org/2016/04/05-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item05). > > Proposed response: > https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/171#issuecomment-205901598 > > “The Working Group agrees that Landmarks are not required to meet SC 1.3.1 > for any page with head/foot/navigation areas as there are other ways to > indicate a page's structure." > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not > been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being > able to live with” this position, please let the group know before the CfC > deadline. > > Thanks, > AWK > > Andrew Kirkpatrick > Group Product Manager, Accessibility > Adobe > > akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com> > http://twitter.com/awkawk > http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility > -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2016 11:53:22 UTC