Re: WCAG extension

I like override, too. This seems like a great way to frame it.
Mike
 


     On Thursday, July 23, 2015 12:10 PM, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com> wrote:
   

 I am not sure cancel is the right term. Override seems more appropriate to me.



* katie *
 
Katie Haritos-Shea 
Senior Accessibility SME (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)
 
Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile | Office: 703-371-5545

-----Original Message-----
From: Laura Carlson [mailto:laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 12:05 PM
To: Joshue O Connor; WCAG
Subject: Re: WCAG extension

Hi again,

On 7/23/15, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote:

> Extensions MUST NOT override WCAG 2.0 conformance requirements and 
> success criterion. (Principle to answer question 2)

A better word for "override" may be "cancel". So that one could read, "Extensions MUST NOT cancel WCAG 2.0 conformance requirements and success criterion."

Kindest Regards,
Laura

--
Laura L. Carlson