- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 10:04:55 +0200
- To: WCAG WG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
- CC: Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>, Eric Velleman <e.velleman@accessibility.nl>
Dear WCAG WG, ERT WG, Thank you for your comments on the previous Editor Draft. We received a total of 46 comments, most of which were just editorial. There were no substantial comments but 3 comments from 2 participants that required to be addressed before publication. The most significant edits were made to the following sections: - Combined Expertise - Step 3.b: Include a Randomly Selected Sample - WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria - Step 5.d: Provide an Aggregated Score (Optional) We now think this document is ready for publication approval. # Editor Draft of 4 July 2014 (final for publication approval): - http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20140704 # Diff-marked version to previously reviewed Editor Draft: - http://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FER%2Fconformance%2FED-methodology-20140623&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FER%2Fconformance%2FED-methodology-20140704 # Comments received on previously reviewed Editor Draft: - https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/WCAG-EM-20140623/results - http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments-20140623 Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Monday, 7 July 2014 08:05:28 UTC