W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: 14 Feb 2013 Agenda ================================================

From: Gian Wild <gian.wild@accessibilityoz.com.au>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 20:35:25 +1100
Message-ID: <CAMSsr_tOjB_eG1v2LvA+7B_Lb2u8ncpUm4C=e-zBKDSzT_6kgQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gregg Vanderheiden <GV@trace.wisc.edu>
Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Regrets

On Thursday, February 14, 2013, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:

> APOLOGIES
>
>     Loretta is out of town -- and I forgot to post the agenda for this
> week.
>
> The agenda is basically the two surveys that were sent out early this
> week.    However only a few people have responded to the surveys.
>
> Please go up and fill out the surveys.  Both are important.    Both are
> described at the bottom of this Agenda.
>
> Thanks
> Gregg
>
>
>
> Meeting Information
> Time: 21:00 UTC, 8 AM Eastern Australia, 10 PM Central Europe, 4 PM
> Eastern US
> World Clock: <*http://tinyurl.com/a96u3xh* <http://tinyurl.com/a96u3xh>>
> Length: up to 90 minutes
> Bridge: +1.617.761.6200 (US), +33.4.26.46.79.03 (France), +44.203.318.0479
> (UK)
> Passcode: 9224#
> IRC: irc.w3.org port: 6665 channel #wai-wcag
>
>
> 1. FINAL 4 SC for WCAG2ICT
>     Survey    https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/FINAL4SC/
>
> 2. *Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology (WCAG-EM) 1.0
> *
>     A survey covering the comment responses -- and the draft is prepared
> and available at
>       https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/WCAGevalTaskForce/
>
> 3. (if we have time ) Responses to Public Comments on WCAG2ICT, starting
>     with LC-2659
>     Survey: *http://tinyurl.com/balvfg3*
>
>
>
>
>
> *SURVEY 1  INFORMATION *
>
> The WCAG WG has approved all but 4 SC in WCAG2ICT.
>
>    - Three of these were approved for documents only and 1 was approved
>    but later found to have a problem and sent back.
>    - All issues were around the topic of "set of software".
>
>
> The WCAG2ICT Task Force has now created a definition of "set of software"
> as requested, and revised the 4 SC involved.
>
> These 5 items are now submitted to the WCAG WG for approval.  There is
> also a 6th item which asks a clarifying question for SC 3.2.4 and suggests
> that the clarification also be included in the INTENT for that SC in
> Understanding WCAG 2.0.
>
> The survey is at
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/FINAL4SC/
>
>
>
> *SURVEY 2  INFORMATION *
> *
> *
> The evaluation Task force has completed its review of comments and created
> a new draft of its document
> *Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology (WCAG-EM) 1.0*
> that it would like to send our for review before CSUN.
>
> A survey covering the comment responses -- and the draft is prepared and
> available at
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/WCAGevalTaskForce/
>
> WCAG EVALUATION IS A VERY IMPORTANT TOPIC
> Please give this document your attention and fill out the survey so that
> we can try to review the responses and text of the document as part of this
> weeks agenda.
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2013 09:36:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 14 February 2013 09:36:01 GMT