W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2013

RE: [html-techs-tf] Agenda Feb 4, 2013

From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 19:08:43 -0500
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP4170A68AD10B0A0739A3F6FE010@phx.gbl>
To: "'Joshue O Connor'" <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>, "'James Nurthen'" <james.nurthen@oracle.com>
CC: "'Protocols and Formats Working Group WG'" <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>, "'WCAG'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I think on all our aria techniques we need to explain what happens to other
labels etc, when we put an aria -labelledby, aria-label, or describedby...
for instance, what happens to the traditional label for=  if that is used,
etc...

Cheers
David MacDonald

CanAdapt Solutions Inc.
  Adapting the web to all users
            Including those with disabilities
www.Can-Adapt.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Joshue O Connor [mailto:joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie] 
Sent: February-01-13 4:09 AM
To: James Nurthen
Cc: Protocols and Formats Working Group WG; WCAG
Subject: Re: [html-techs-tf] Agenda Feb 4, 2013

> Agenda:
>
> 1. Survey with 1 technique for Review
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/04feb2013/
> 2. Discussion of Accessibility Support Database

Extra addendum for Mondays call:

3) Discuss the possibility of creating techniques to address the issue
raised in this bug https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12794

Thanks to Leoniť for passing it on.

Josh
Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 00:09:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 4 February 2013 00:09:17 GMT