W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2012

Minutes WCAG 14 June 2012

From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:47:26 -0400
Message-ID: <4FE074DE.9090700@w3.org>
To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
CC: GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Minutes of the 14 June 2012 WCAG meeting are posted to
http://www.w3.org/2012/06/14-wai-wcag-minutes.html and copied below.


  Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference


    14 Jun 2012

Agenda <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2012AprJun/0098.html>

See also: IRC log <http://www.w3.org/2012/06/14-wai-wcag-irc>


    Attendees

Present
    Bruce_Bailey, +1.206.544.aaaa, Marc_Johlic, Cooper, Alex_Li,
    Cherie_Eckholm, Robin_Tuttle, Gregg_Vanderheiden, +1.978.562.aabb,
    MoeKraft, Adam_Solomon, David_MacDonald, +1.617.584.aacc, Katie,
    Andrew_Kirkpatrick, James_Nurthen, Kathy, +1.613.806.aadd
Regrets
Chair
    Gregg_Vanderheiden
Scribe
    MoeKraft


    Contents

    * Topics <http://www.w3.org/2012/06/14-wai-wcag-minutes.html#agenda>
         1. Results of Questionairre
            <http://www.w3.org/2012/06/14-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item01>
         2. SC 1.2.4 in Understanding WCAG 2.0
            <http://www.w3.org/2012/06/14-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item02>
         3. SC 2.4.7 in Understanding WCAG 2.0
            <http://www.w3.org/2012/06/14-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item03>
         4. Add to RESOLUTION to SC 1.2.9
            <http://www.w3.org/2012/06/14-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item04>
         5. SC 2.4.7 in Understanding WCAG 2.0
            <http://www.w3.org/2012/06/14-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item05>
         6. SC 3.3.4 in Understanding WCAG 2.0
            <http://www.w3.org/2012/06/14-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item06>
    * Summary of Action Items
      <http://www.w3.org/2012/06/14-wai-wcag-minutes.html#ActionSummary>

------------------------------------------------------------------------

<trackbot> Date: 14 June 2012

<MichaelC> scribe: MoeKraft

<greggvanderheiden> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/2012-06-14/results


      Results of Questionairre


      SC 1.2.4 in Understanding WCAG 2.0

*RESOLUTION: To add the following to the understanding document for SC
1.2.4 This success criterion was intended to apply to broadcast of
synchronized media and is not intended to require that two-way
multimedia calls between two or more individuals through web apps must
be captioned regardless of the needs of users. Responsibility for
providing captions would fall to the content providers (the callers) or
the “host” caller, and not the application.*


      SC 2.4.7 in Understanding WCAG 2.0


      Add to RESOLUTION to SC 1.2.9

*RESOLUTION: To add the following to the Understanding document for SC
1.2.9 This success criterion was intended to apply to broadcast of audio
and is not intended to require that two-way audio calls between two or
more individuals through web apps must be captioned regardless of the
needs of users. Responsibility for providing captions would fall to the
content providers (the callers) or the “host” caller, and not the
application.*


      SC 2.4.7 in Understanding WCAG 2.0

*RESOLUTION: To Add the following 2 paragraphs to Understanding document
for SC 2.4.7 The purpose of this success criterion is to help a person
know which element among multiple elements has the keyboard focus. If
there is only one keyboard actionable control on the screen, the success
criterion would be met because the visual design presents only one
keyboard actionable item.*
... Note that a keyboard focus indicator can take different forms. One
common way is a caret within the text field to indicate that the text
field has the keyboard focus. Another is a visual change to a button to
indicate that that button has the keyboard focus.


      SC 3.3.4 in Understanding WCAG 2.0

<greggvanderheiden> https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/

*RESOLUTION: To modify the end of the first paragraph of the INTENT of
SC 3.3.4 to read: Likewise, it may be an unrecoverable error if users
unintentionally modify or delete data stored in a database that they
later need to access, such as their entire travel profile in a travel
services web site. When referring to modification or deletion of 'user
controllable' data, the intent is to prevent mass loss of data such as
deleting a file or record.*
... It is not the intent to require a confirmation for each save command
or the simple creation or editing of documents, records or other data.

<MichaelC> Comment Tracker
<http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/>


    Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl
<http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm>
version 1.136 (CVS log <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/>)
$Date: 2012/06/14 21:45:56 $

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 

Michael Cooper
Web Accessibility Specialist
World Wide Web Consortium, Web Accessibility Initiative
E-mail cooper@w3.org <mailto:cooper@w3.org>
Information Page <http://www.w3.org/People/cooper/>
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 12:47:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 June 2012 12:47:55 GMT