W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Survey available

From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 07:33:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHu5OWYB+t00t4Mq_aDBLMNQRZYJgG07RUP8qk7FO8NQGqWiog@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Cc: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Thanks, everyone! I've updated the survey to fix these issues. Steve, I
hope you will be able to join us on Thursday (although I realize it is not
a convenient time for you).

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi All,
> I am pleased to see that the html5 alt document is being reviewed.
>
> comments:
> 2. Example 5.1
>
> Example 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/TR/html-alt-techniques/#har> doesn’t have
> a Title element in the image link to a long description but 2.2 does have
> one and recommends it. (It is recommended that this use of Title attribute
> be checked with the WCAG WG).
>
> I am unclear what the relationship between  example 5.1<http://www.w3.org/TR/html-alt-techniques/#har>and example
> 2.2 <http://www.w3.org/TR/html-alt-techniques/#ex22> is?
>
> Is 5.1 the correct reference?
>
> Also note the question refere to the title element should be title
> attribute.
>
> 3. Example 6.4
> the mention of 'willful violation' is in reference to the WHATWG HTML
> living standard which states that the type of image described in example
> 6.4 MUST have a null alt text.
>
> regards
> Steve
>
>
> On 28 April 2012 02:17, Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>wrote:
>
>> I wanted to give people extra time on this one:
>>
>> "HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives" for 03 May 2012
>> *<http://tinyurl.com/cy7q8qm*>
>>
>
>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 28 April 2012 14:33:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 28 April 2012 14:33:35 GMT