W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Survey available

From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 09:20:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+ri+VmkTOPAwwkKiuEks9O_xE3f0rEM2A71zPock=FwU1EJ2g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hi All,
I am pleased to see that the html5 alt document is being reviewed.

2. Example 5.1

Example 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/TR/html-alt-techniques/#har> doesn’t have a
Title element in the image link to a long description but 2.2 does have one
and recommends it. (It is recommended that this use of Title attribute be
checked with the WCAG WG).

I am unclear what the relationship between  example
5.1<http://www.w3.org/TR/html-alt-techniques/#har>and example
2.2 <http://www.w3.org/TR/html-alt-techniques/#ex22> is?

Is 5.1 the correct reference?

Also note the question refere to the title element should be title

3. Example 6.4
the mention of 'willful violation' is in reference to the WHATWG HTML
living standard which states that the type of image described in example
6.4 MUST have a null alt text.


On 28 April 2012 02:17, Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>wrote:

> I wanted to give people extra time on this one:
> "HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives" for 03 May 2012
> *<http://tinyurl.com/cy7q8qm*>
Received on Saturday, 28 April 2012 08:21:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:34:09 UTC