W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: Another further example for F69

From: James Nurthen <james.nurthen@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:23:16 -0800
Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <B1C99229-B0A4-41F5-868A-15687E9CFA59@oracle.com>
To: Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@googlemail.com>
These also fail text-only resize in firefox when you use text-only resize to get to a 200% size.
I think this doesn't fail in IE with text-only zoom only because the largest is not a 200% zoom, but much less.

--James

On Nov 18, 2011, at 3:05 AM, Kerstin Probiesch wrote:

> Dear WG,
> 
> I tried my best for bad coding (F69). It's just an idea and I'm sure it
> needs much more bad code ;-). Please find the examples here:
> 
> - http://is.gd/tS634P
> - http://is.gd/vrIoXY
> 
> The failure occurs _just_ with a screen resolution of 1024x768. If I haven't
> overseen something: it passes text-only resize (IE text size: "largest" and
> the FF equivalent) but fails the page zoom in IE8, FF3.6.24, FF7.0.1 (and I
> suggest in some other browsers too). 
> 
> 
> Regs
> 
> Kerstin
> 
> 
Received on Saturday, 19 November 2011 02:23:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 19 November 2011 02:23:54 GMT