W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: Do buttons need to follow 2.4.4 or 2.4.6?

From: adam solomon <adam.solomon2@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 10:49:11 +0300
Message-ID: <CALKv3=iMxpoJJ=tZ8dxkm2HNf=r5JEA3eOmdz1r+YdV0oKOfpw@mail.gmail.com>
To: James Nurthen <james.nurthen@oracle.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20101014/H91 would seem to
indicate that it is a problem of 4.1.2. You have brought up a good point -
2.4.4 speaks specifically about links, not buttons, though the spirit of it
could certainly pertain to buttons. We should really clarify this point and
decide if that flash technique is really in the right place.

On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:51 AM, James Nurthen <james.nurthen@oracle.com>wrote:

> Button labels (whether from the text of the button element or the value of
> button input elements) don't seem to fit into either 2.4.4 (link purpose in
> context) or 2.4.6 (Headings and Labels).
>
> Does the button text need to fully identify the purpose of the button (for
> example when buttons are repeated on multiple rows of a table to perform an
> action on the row) or is it sufficient for the button to identify the
> purpose within the context of the correctly marked up row header?
>
> Note that FLASH27 (FLASH27: Providing button labels that describe the
> purpose of a button ) is explicitly stated as being a sufficient technique
> for 2.4.4. Can I extend this to imply that HTML buttons are covered by 2.4.4
> too?
>
> Regards,
> James
>
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 07:49:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 August 2011 07:49:39 GMT