W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2011

minutes WCAG 24 February 2011

From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:02:38 -0500
Message-ID: <4D6BC71E.4020504@w3.org>
To: List WAI GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Minutes of the 24 February 2011 WCAG meeting are posted to
http://www.w3.org/2011/02/24-wai-wcag-minutes.html and copied below.


  Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference


    24 Feb 2011

Agenda <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2011JanMar/0034.html>

See also: IRC log <http://www.w3.org/2011/02/24-wai-wcag-irc>


    Attendees

Present
    Bruce_Bailey, Michael_Cooper, Adam_Solomon, Marc_Johlic,
    James_Nurthen, Loretta_Guarino_Reid, Tim_Boland, David_MacDonald
Regrets
Chair
    Loretta Guarino Reid
Scribe
    marcjohlic


    Contents

    * Topics <http://www.w3.org/2011/02/24-wai-wcag-minutes.html#agenda>
         1. Issue LC-2448: use of fieldset should not be required for
            any group of logically related input elements
            <http://www.w3.org/2011/02/24-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item01>
         2. Issue LC-2457: H93 and H94 are out of place
            <http://www.w3.org/2011/02/24-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item02>
         3. Issue LC-2465: Test needs specification of window size and
            criteria for compliance
            <http://www.w3.org/2011/02/24-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item03>
         4. Issue LC-2467: H82 missing?
            <http://www.w3.org/2011/02/24-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item04>
         5. Issue LC-2471: H89: certainly cannot be a sufficient
            technique
            <http://www.w3.org/2011/02/24-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item05>
         6. Issue LC-2472: Sufficient techniques- definition and
            guidance
            <http://www.w3.org/2011/02/24-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item06>
         7. Issue LC-2474: Require both sufficient techniques
            <http://www.w3.org/2011/02/24-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item07>
         8. Issue LC-2437: I think there is a failure missing
            <http://www.w3.org/2011/02/24-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item08>
    * Summary of Action Items
      <http://www.w3.org/2011/02/24-wai-wcag-minutes.html#ActionSummary>

------------------------------------------------------------------------

STATUS UPDATE

Ported 8 Silverlight techniques - speeding up - Wolf has offered to help
out, Michael will coordinate with him. Targeting March 10th


      Issue LC-2448: use of fieldset should not be required for any
      group of logically related input elements

<adam> http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/H71

<Loretta> For a set of related controls enclosed within a fieldset element:

<David> sorry I"m late

<jamesn> <form action="http://example.com/adduser" method="post">

<jamesn> <fieldset>

<jamesn> <legend>Residential Address</legend>

<jamesn> <input type="radio" name="addressType" value="R" title="Use
this address">

<jamesn> <label for="raddress">Address: </label>

<jamesn> <input type="text" id="raddress" name="raddress" />

<jamesn> <label for="rzip">Postal/Zip Code: </label>

<jamesn> <input type="text" id="rzip" name="rzip" />

<jamesn> ...more residential address information...

<jamesn> </fieldset>

<jamesn> <fieldset>

<jamesn> <legend>Postal Address</legend>

<jamesn> <input type="radio" name="addressType" value="P" title="Use
this address">

<jamesn> <label for="paddress">Address: </label>

<jamesn> <input type="text" id="paddress" name="paddress" />

<jamesn> <label for="pzip">Postal/Zip Code: </label>

<jamesn> <input type="text" id="pzip" name="pzip" />

<jamesn> ...more postal address information...

<jamesn> </fieldset>

<jamesn> </form>

<Loretta> For a set of related controls enclosed within a fieldset element:

<David> For a set of logically related controls enclosed within a
fieldset element:

<scribe> *ACTION:* adam to work on clarifying the Test procedure for
this technique [recorded in
http://www.w3.org/2011/02/24-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-128 - Work on clarifying the Test procedure
for this technique [on Adam Solomon - due 2011-03-03].

*RESOLUTION: Open pending action item*


      Issue LC-2457: H93 and H94 are out of place

*RESOLUTION: Accepted as proposed*


      Issue LC-2465: Test needs specification of window size and
      criteria for compliance

*RESOLUTION: Accepted as amended*


      Issue LC-2467: H82 missing?

*RESOLUTION: Accepted as proposed*


      Issue LC-2471: H89: certainly cannot be a sufficient technique

*RESOLUTION: Accepted as proposed*


      Issue LC-2472: Sufficient techniques- definition and guidance

*RESOLUTION: Accepted as proposed*


      Issue LC-2474: Require both sufficient techniques

*RESOLUTION: Accepted as proposed*


      Issue LC-2437: I think there is a failure missing

<Loretta>
http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=F3:_Failure_of_Success_Criterion_1.1.1_due_to_using_CSS_to_include_images_that_convey_important_information

*RESOLUTION: Accepted as proposed*


    Summary of Action Items

*[NEW]* *ACTION:* adam to work on clarifying the Test procedure for this
technique [recorded in
http://www.w3.org/2011/02/24-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action01]
 
[End of minutes]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl
<http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm>
version 1.135 (CVS log <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/>)
$Date: 2011/02/28 16:02:22 $


-- 

Michael Cooper
Web Accessibility Specialist
World Wide Web Consortium, Web Accessibility Initiative
E-mail cooper@w3.org <mailto:cooper@w3.org>
Information Page <http://www.w3.org/People/cooper/>
Received on Monday, 28 February 2011 16:03:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 28 February 2011 16:03:17 GMT