W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: 2 hour meetings?

From: Mary Utt <maryutt@paciellogroup.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:17:36 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTim=vYSEvi+Fe98xEr2UKe=24aGQTq8nXMXSgwE6@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I agree with Andrew. Would the add'l 30 mins be added before or after
the current meeting time?

Thanks,

Mary

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote:
> I grudgingly support the idea of 2 hour meetings. :)
>
> Thanks,
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
> Adobe Systems
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
> http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Loretta Guarino Reid
> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 6:24 PM
> To: WCAG
> Subject: 2 hour meetings?
>
> The question was raised at today's meeting whether we should resume 2
> hour meetings, to cover techniques more quickly. We don't have an
> external deadline that we must meet for our next update, but the
> sooner we can publish, the more information is available to authors,
> tool writers, and users.
>
> So, please let us know how you feel about switching to a 2 hour teleconference.
>
> Loretta
>
>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 30 October 2010 15:34:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 30 October 2010 15:34:22 GMT