W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2009

RE: Tech G19

From: Roberto Scano \(IWA/HWG\) <r.scano@webprofession.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:56:36 +0100
To: "'WCAG'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <49c24f15.1c215e0a.74a0.fffff65f@mx.google.com>

-----Original Message-----
Could you explain where the mistake is? The note does not refer to a 
(non-existing) technique but just says "failure threshold" (general 
flash and red flash thresholds are defined at
That should be OK.
The WCAG WG chose not to write failures that would just state the 
inverse of a sucess criterion.

Roberto Scano:
My question was: is really necessary to refer in a note to something that
didn't exist (a failure with "3.5 flashes or more")
Received on Thursday, 19 March 2009 13:57:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:59:47 UTC