W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2009

Tech G19

From: Roberto Scano \(IWA/HWG\) <r.scano@webprofession.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:04:29 +0100
To: "'WCAG'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <49c242df.09b6660a.2373.ffff8060@mx.google.com>
Hi all, i think there is a mistake here: 


http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20081211/G19


Note 1 said:

---
Note 1: This technique is stricter than the Level 1 Success Criteria but is
easier to test and can be used to meet the Level 1 Success Criteria because
all failure thresholds in the Level 1 Success Criteria involve flashing 3.5
flashes or more within one second. Most content does not flash at all and
even content that blinks does not blink this fast except on rare occasions.
Therefore, in order to avoid having to carry out the more complex testing
specified by the Success Criteria, one could follow this technique to ensure
that content only flashes one, two, or at most three times in any 1-second
period. 
---

But this Is a level 1 success criteria and i don't find any failure for the
cited 3.5 flashes:

http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/seizure-does-not-violate.html



---
Roberto Scano (rscano@webprofession.com)
International Webmasters Association / HTML Writers Guild 
Received on Thursday, 19 March 2009 13:05:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:56 GMT