W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2009

RE: SCR21

From: David MacDonald <befree@magma.ca>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:14:26 -0400
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lorettaguarino@google.com>, "'Michael Cooper'" <cooper@w3.org>, "'Ben Caldwell'" <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu>
Message-ID: <003701c9f049$01c69480$0553bd80$@ca>
Is there a meeting this week?

 

I'll b in an airport but can make some of the call if its on.

 

David

 

access empowers people...

        ...barriers disable them...

 

www.eramp.com

From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Andi Snow-Weaver
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 4:10 PM
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: SCR21

 

Christophe wrote: 
>The introduction to the techniques document 
><http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/intro.html> does not explain what 
>failing the test procedure in a technique means. We could add an 
>explanation there. But users who come to a technique through 
>"Understanding WCAG 2.0" or "How to Meet WCAG 2.0" will probably not 
>see that explanation. Should we add something in the test section of 
>the techniques?

Christophe, I think we should do both but we need to get this explanation
out immediately. Does the W3C have some kind of mechanism for publishing a
clarification such as this?

Andi 
Received on Thursday, 18 June 2009 19:15:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:56 GMT