W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: Bugzilla Issue 2718 (Spelling/Grammatical Error) Proposed Resolution

From: Ben Caldwell <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 09:30:24 -0500
Message-ID: <4A27DA80.2070309@trace.wisc.edu>
To: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
CC: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Thanks Tim. Since this is just a typo, I went ahead and marked the issue as 
verified and will make the change.

Regarding the language change, I prefer the "at least" language to the "greater 
than or equal to" option, but could go either way if others feel differently.

Totally fine for WG memebers to tackle this kind of thing. It's much appreciated.

All the best,

-Ben


Tim Boland wrote:
> For Bugzilla Issue 2718 [1], I propose acceptance of the requestor’s 
> proposed change, but wouldn’t it be clearer if  the Situation B for 
> “Understanding SC1.4.3” title read: “text is greater than or equal to 18 
> point if not bold and greater than or equal to 14 point if bold”?   This 
> wording seems more consistent with Situation A wording and makes it 
> clearer that all possible scenarios are covered by Situations A and B 
> together..  I have updated Bugzilla entry with “Tim proposes acceptance 
> – awaiting Group decision?  Hope it’s OK to do this – if not please let 
> me know and I will rescind entry ..
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks and best wishes
> 
> Tim Boland NIST
> 
>  
> 
> [1]: http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=2718
> 
>  
> 


-- 
Ben Caldwell | <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu>
Trace Research and Development Center <http://trace.wisc.edu>


Received on Thursday, 4 June 2009 14:32:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:56 GMT