W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: : Developing a Web Accessibility Business Case for Your Organization

From: Sailesh Panchang <spanchang02@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 13:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <63655.98503.qm@web37905.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
To: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org

Loretta,
I ran through 2 pages and have a couple of 
suggestions. I still need to run through the Finance page.
My comment is prefixed with my name.

===
On http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/soc.html
Refer: supplemental illustrations  ([WCAG 2.0 Guideline 3.1;] WCAG 1.0 Checkpoint 14.2)
Sailesh: WCAG2 does not require  illustration like WCAG 1.0 14.2 does. So remove reference to Guideline 3.1
Refer: clear and consistent design, navigation, and links 
([WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria 2.4.1, 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.4.9, 3.2.3, 3.2.4;] WCAG 1.0 Checkpoint 13.1, 13.3, 13.4, 13.5, 13.6, 13.7, 13.8, 14.3)
Sailesh: SC 2.4.2 should be included. Note: this appears thrice on this page. 

===
On http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/tech.html 
• Reduce unwanted page downloading, and thus server requests, by providing clear and consistent design, navigation, and links 
([WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria 2.4.4, 2.4.9, 2.4.5, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 2.4.1, 2.4.6, 3.2.3, 3.2.4;] WCAG 1.0 Checkpoint 13.1, 13.3, 13.4, 13.5, 13.6, 13.7, 13.8,
14.3)
Sailesh: SC 2.4.2 should be included. 

I will get back on the Finance page in a few days.
Thanks,
Sailesh



--- On Wed, 4/29/09, Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com> wrote:

> From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
> Subject: Fwd: Developing a Web Accessibility Business Case for Your   Organization
> To: "WCAG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> Date: Wednesday, April 29, 2009, 2:57 PM
> Could we get a volunteer to review
> this document to be sure that
> references to WCAG 2.0 are interpreting it correctly? Note
> requested
> deadline of May 15 (in 2 weeks).
> 
> Loretta and Gregg
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Andrew Arch <andrew@w3.org>
> Date: Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 3:00 AM
> Subject: Developing a Web Accessibility Business Case for
> Your Organization
> To: team-wcag-editors@w3.org
> Cc: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>,
> WAI-AGE <team-wai-age@w3.org>
> 
> 
> Hi Gregg and Loretta,
> 
> The WAI-AGE project has been updating the Web Accessibility
> Business
> Case to include more discussion of older people and to add
> WCAG 2.0
> references. Before we publish the new version which will be
> ready for
> EOWG approval in May, we would like to have our inclusion
> of WCAG 2.0
> SC ratified.
> 
> Would the WCAG WG be able to review our SC references by
> May 15 when
> we expect EOWG to approve publication?
> 
> The pages with WCAG 2.0 SC references are:
>  http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/Overview.html
>  http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/soc.html
>  http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/tech.html
>  http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/fin.html
> The page about Legal and Policy factors does not contain SC
> references.
> 
> Thanks, Andrew
> 
> --
> Andrew Arch
> Web Accessibility and Ageing Specialist
> http://www.w3.org/People/Andrew/
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/WAI-AGE/
> 
> 


      
Received on Friday, 1 May 2009 20:07:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:56 GMT